mmm. id still say add 'from' because to me it implies that i can log into anywhere in the world.
its a website that i can log into from anywhere in the world

pedantic, sure.

I agree with you Daemo

Looks very nice and clean

Its nice and all, as in, its a nice clean simple design, easy to read, easy to navigate, nice and small so loads quick on a slow connection, Color scheme looks nice ect.

But heres my problem, and dont take offence please, im just trying to help by looking at it from you customers point of view.
I have no issue with the design itself, just the name of the site Vs the design.

Your site is "web Dev 2.0" implying your a company specializes in developing web 2.0 sites. However the design seems too simple and too plain for a Web Designers site, and certianlly is not a "web 2.0" site.

Your portfolio is rather thin for a company thats "been providing website solutions to businesses and organisations for over 3 years".
None of your sites are particually modern in appearance, and i certianlly wouldnt consider them Web 2.0.


So other than that little problem (and its more one of definition than anything) i think its quiet well done

EDIT: Oh and ya nav bar messes up at low res.
Itd probly be better if it wasnt fluid, or was fixed from below 800px.

I love the design, but the colour scheme and selection of fonts need some work.
Also: get rid of that ancient '@' image. xD

You say you adhere to W3C standards but not one of your pages is fully compliant. I know they are simple errors but it is one of my pet peeves about web design companies that proclaim certain stuff.

Now that's not the point he was making, was it?

I like the graphics, and the fonts used in the graphics, very polished